Impact of Sublingual Nitroglycerin on the Assessment of Computed Tomography-derived Fractional Flow Reserve: An Intraindividual Comparison Study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of nitroglycerin (NTG) on the assessment of computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-seven patients with suspected coronary artery disease were recruited, and they underwent computed tomography angiography (CCTA) before and after NTG administration. The CT-FFRs were compared at 2 CCTAs. The difference was compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Patients were divided into normal and stenosis groups according to CCTA results. Vessels in the stenosis group were further divided into different groups based on coronary artery calcium score (CACS) and stenosis degree. The poststenotic CT-FFR differences before and after NTG (DCT-FFR) were calculated to evaluate the impact of stenosis degree and CACS. Terminal CT-FFRs derived from CCTAs before and after NTG in total and vessel-specific levels were compared in the normal group. RESULTS: Of 47 patients in the stenosis group, poststenotic CT-FFR was significantly increased after NTG at per-vessel level. By taking CT-FFR of 0.75 or lower as the threshold, 5 and 4 patients showed abnormal CT-FFR before and after NTG, respectively. No significant differences were noted among the various stenosis degree and CACS groups regarding DCT-FFR. Of 30 patients in the normal group, terminal CT-FFR was significantly increased after NTG in total level and vessel-specific level of left anterior descending and right coronary artery, but not in the left circumflex. CONCLUSIONS: Both post lesion and distal vessel CT-FFR significantly improved after the administration of GTN with the degree of change not affected by stenosis severity or CACS.

Clinical Efficacy of Intracoronary Papaverine After Nicorandil Administration for Safe and Optimal Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement.

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is considered the standard for assessment of the physiological significance of coronary artery stenosis. Intracoronary papaverine (PAP) is the most potent vasodilator used for the achievement of maximal hyperemia. However, its use can provoke ventricular tachycardia (VT) due to excessive QT prolongation. We evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of the administration of PAP after nicorandil (NIC), a potassium channel opener that prevents VT, for optimal FFR measurement.A total of 127 patients with 178 stenoses were enrolled. The FFR values were measured using NIC (NIC-FFR) and PAP (PAP-FFR). We administered PAP following NIC (NIC-PAP). Changes in the FFR and electrogram parameters (baseline versus NIC versus PAP) were assessed and the incidence of arrhythmias after PAP was evaluated. In addition, we analyzed another 41 patients with 51 stenoses by assessing the FFR using PAP before NIC (PAP-NIC). After propensity score matching, the electrogram parameters between 2 groups were compared.The mean PAP-FFR was significantly lower than the mean NIC-FFR (0.82 ± 0.11 versus 0.81 ± 0.11, P < 0.05). The mean baseline-QTc, NIC-QTc, and PAP-QTc values were 425 ± 37 ms1/2, 424 ± 41 ms1/2, and 483 ± 54 ms1/2, respectively. VT occurred in only 1 patient (0.6%). Although PAP induced QTc prolongation (P < 0.05), the PAP-QTc duration was significantly shorter in NIC-PAP compared to PAP-NIC (P < 0.05).The administration of PAP with NIC may induce sufficient hyperemia and prevent fatal arrhythmia through reductions in the PAP-induced QTc prolongation during FFR measurement.

Effects of Empagliflozin on Myocardial Flow Reserve in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The SIMPLE Trial.

Background Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors reduce hospitalizations for heart failure and cardiovascular death, although the underlying mechanisms have not been resolved. The SIMPLE trial (The Effects of Empagliflozin on Myocardial Flow Reserve in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus) investigated the effects of empagliflozin on myocardial flow reserve (MFR) reflecting microvascular perfusion, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus at high cardiovascular disease risk. Methods and Results We randomized 90 patients to either empagliflozin 25 mg once daily or placebo for 13 weeks, as add-on to standard therapy. The primary outcome was change in MFR at week 13, quantified by Rubidium-82 positron emission tomography/computed tomography. The secondary key outcomes were changes in resting rate-pressure product adjusted MFR, changes to myocardial flow during rest and stress, and reversible cardiac ischemia. Mean baseline MFR was 2.21 (95% CI, 2.08-2.35). There was no change from baseline in MFR at week 13 in either the empagliflozin: 0.01 (95% CI, -0.18 to 0.21) or placebo groups: 0.06 (95% CI, -0.15 to 0.27), with no treatment effect -0.05 (95% CI, -0.33 to 0.23). No effects on the secondary outcome parameters by Rubidium-82 positron emission tomography/computed tomography was observed. Treatment with empagliflozin reduced hemoglobin A1c by 0.76% (95% CI, 1.0-0.5; P<0.001) and increased hematocrit by 1.69% (95% CI, 0.7-2.6; P<0.001). Conclusions Empagliflozin did not improve MFR among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and high cardiovascular disease risk. The present study does not support that short-term improvement in MFR explains the reduction in cardiovascular events observed in the outcome trials. Registration URL: https://clinicaltrialsregister.eu/; Unique identifier: 2016-003743-10.

Additional decrease in fractional flow reserve in the left anterior descending artery after hand-grip exercise during pharmacological coronary hyperemia.

Maximal hyperemia at the time of fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement is generally induced by vasodilators, even when hyperemia at the onset of angina symptoms is caused by exercise stress. This study was designed to evaluate whether pharmacological hyperemia could be used as a substitute for exercise-induced hyperemia during FFR measurement. Twenty-two patients with angiographically intermediate stenosis in the left anterior descending artery (LAD) were prospectively enrolled. FFR measurements were repeated in the following two conditions while the pressure-wire was positioned in the same segment; (1) during pharmacological hyperemia induced by intracoronary administration of 2 mg nicorandil, (2) immediately after isotonic hand-grip exercise for 90 s (50% of maximum voluntary contraction) followed by intracoronary administration of 2 mg nicorandil. Isotonic hand-grip exercise increased systolic blood pressure (130 ± 19 versus 150 ± 22 mmHg, p < 0.001), heart rate (71 ± 11 versus 79 ± 13 bpm, p < 0.001), and cardiac output (5.1 ± 1.2 versus 5.9 ± 1.5 L/min, p < 0.001), which indicated an increased afterload on the left ventricle. After the hand-grip exercise, FFR significantly decreased from 0.86 ± 0.06 to 0.84 ± 0.06 (p < 0.001). A percent increase in systolic blood pressure and cardiac output after hand-grip exercise strongly correlated with ΔFFR (r = - 0.65, p < 0.001 and r = - 0.55, p < 0.001, respectively). An increase in cardiac output with hand-grip exercise during pharmacological hyperemia could induce an additional decrease in FFR for lesions located in the LAD.

Influence of caffeine intake on intravenous adenosine-induced fractional flow reserve.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated whether caffeine abstention is required before fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement by intravenous adenosine triphosphate (ATP) administration in Japanese patients. METHODS: This study was a subanalysis of a previously published study and a total of 208 intermediate lesions that underwent FFR measurements were enrolled for this analysis. Hyperemia was induced by continuous intravenous ATP infusion at 150 µg/kg/min (IVATP150) and 210 µg/kg/min (IVATP210), and by intracoronary administration of nicorandil 2 mg (ICNIC2mg) as a reference standard. RESULTS: The degree of change in the FFR value after ICNIC2mg and IVATP210 was similar between the caffeine and non-caffeine groups (0.00 ± 0.02 vs. 0.01 ± 0.02). In patients who consumed caffeine before the FFR measurement, the degree of FFR change was independent of the time interval (<12 h, 12-24 h, and 24-48 h) between caffeine intake and catheterization both after IVATP150 and ICNIC2mg and after IVATP210 and ICNIC2mg. CONCLUSION: When compared with the FFR value after ICNIC2mg, the degree of change in the FFR value after IVATP210 were similar regardless of caffeine intake. Strict caffeine abstention before intravenous ATP-induced FFR measurement may not be required in clinical practice.

Hemodynamic Change of Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque After Statin Treatment: A Serial Follow-Up Study by Computed Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve.

Background Whether statin treatment can improve hemodynamic status of coronary atherosclerotic plaque remains unknown. It is of clinical interest to explore the hemodynamic change of coronary lesions after statin treatment. Methods and Results Consecutive patients with intermediate pre-test probability of coronary artery disease were prospectively enrolled and underwent baseline coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) as well as follow-up CCTA. The primary end point was to determine the lesion-specific change of △computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve (△CT-FFR, defined as the change of CT-FFR value across each lesion) after rosuvastatin treatment. The secondary end point was to compare the change of other plaque characteristics according to serial CCTA findings. 152 patients (mean age: 67.1±9.7 years, 100 men, mean follow-up duration of 13.9±2.5 months) were finally included. In non-calcified plaque subgroup, △CT-FFR was significantly lower at follow-up compared with baseline (0.051±0.010 versus 0.035±0.012, P=0.013). All other parameters were not found to be significantly different between baseline and follow-up CCTA measurements. In calcified plaque and mixed plaque subgroups, all parameters showed no significant differences between baseline and follow-up CCTA groups (P>0.05 for all). According to multivariate regression analysis, non-calcified plaque was >2 times more likely than calcified plaque to observe the decrease of △CT-FFR (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.05 [1.03-4.09], P=0.042). Conclusions In patients with mild to intermediate coronary stenosis, rosuvastatin treatment resulted in a reduction in lesion-specific △CT-FFR at mid-term follow-up. This hemodynamic improvement was mainly observed for non-calcified lesions.

Invasive fractional flow reserve: Which technology is best?

Invasive pressure measurements using hyperemic fractional flow reserve (FFR) and nonhyperemic pressure measurements (NHPR) are superior to angiography alone for assessment of 50-90% stenoses. FFR devices using piezoelectric and optical sensors achieve 94% concordance in FFR values; microcatheter designs have more lesion-crossing failures and less pressure drift compared with guidewire designs. Despite the similarity in statistical performance among FFR devices, interventional cardiologists may prefer to use NHPR to avoid the need for adenosine-related side effects, variations in vasodilator response, and limited application in patients with certain clinical and anatomic features.

Ticagrelor and preconditioning in patients with stable coronary artery disease (TAPER-S): a randomized pilot clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Ticagrelor is a reversibly binding, direct-acting, oral, P2Y12 antagonist used for the prevention of atherothrombotic events in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Ticagrelor blocks adenosine reuptake through the inhibition of equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (ENT-1) on erythrocytes and platelets, thereby facilitating adenosine-induced physiological responses such as an increase in coronary blood flow velocity. Meanwhile, adenosine plays an important role in triggering ischemic preconditioning through the activation of the A1 receptor. Therefore, an increase in ticagrelor-enhanced adenosine bioavailability may confer beneficial effects through mechanisms related to preconditioning activation and improvement of coronary microvascular dysfunction. METHODS: To determine whether ticagrelor can trigger ischemic preconditioning and influence microvascular function, we designed this prospective, open-label, pilot study that enrolled patients with stable multivessel CAD requiring staged, fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Participants will be randomized in 1:1 ratios either to ticagrelor (loading dose (LD) 180 mg, maintenance dose (MD) 90 mg bid) or to clopidogrel (LD 600 mg, MD 75 mg) from 3 to 1 days before the scheduled PCI. The PCI operators will be blinded to the randomization arm. The primary endpoint is the delta (difference) between ST segment elevations (in millimeters, mm) as assessed by intracoronary electrocardiogram (ECG) during the two-step sequential coronary balloon inflation in the culprit vessel. Secondary endpoints are 1) changes in coronary flow reserve (CFR), index of microvascular resistance (IMR), and FFR measured in the culprit vessel and reference vessel at the end of PCI, and 2) angina score during inflations. This study started in 2018 with the aim of enrolling 100 patients. Based on the rate of negative FFR up to 30% and a drop-out rate up to 10%, we expect to detect an absolute difference of 4 mm among the study arms in the mean change of ST elevation following repeated balloon inflations. All study procedures were reviewed and approved by the Ethical Committee of the Catholic University of Sacred Heart. DISCUSSION: Ticagrelor might improve ischemia tolerance and microvascular function compared to clopidogrel, and these effects might translate to better long-term clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT No. 2016-004746-28. No. NCT02701140.  TRIAL STATUS: Information provided in this manuscript refers to the definitive version (n. 3.0) of the study protocol, dated 31 October 2017, and includes all protocol amendments. Recruitment started on 18 September 2018 and is currently ongoing. The enrollment is expected to be completed by the end of 2019. TRIAL SPONSOR: Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli - Roma, Polo di Scienze Cardiovascolari e Toraciche, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy.

Effects of Intracoronary Alteplase on Microvascular Function in Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Background Impaired microcirculatory reperfusion worsens prognosis following acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. In the T-TIME (A Trial of Low-Dose Adjunctive Alteplase During Primary PCI) trial, microvascular obstruction on cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging did not differ with adjunctive, low-dose, intracoronary alteplase (10 or 20 mg) versus placebo during primary percutaneous coronary intervention. We evaluated the effects of intracoronary alteplase, during primary percutaneous coronary intervention, on the index of microcirculatory resistance, coronary flow reserve, and resistive reserve ratio. Methods and Results A prespecified physiology substudy of the T-TIME trial. From 2016 to 2017, patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction ≤6 hours from symptom onset were randomized in a double-blind study to receive alteplase 20 mg, alteplase 10 mg, or placebo infused into the culprit artery postreperfusion, but prestenting. Index of microcirculatory resistance, coronary flow reserve, and resistive reserve ratio were measured after percutaneous coronary intervention. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance was performed at 2 to 7 days and 3 months. Analyses in relation to ischemic time (<2, 2-4, and ≥4 hours) were prespecified. One hundred forty-four patients (mean age, 59±11 years; 80% male) were prospectively enrolled, representing 33% of the overall population (n=440). Overall, index of microcirculatory resistance (median, 29.5; interquartile range, 17.0-55.0), coronary flow reserve(1.4 [1.1-2.0]), and resistive reserve ratio (1.7 [1.3-2.3]) at the end of percutaneous coronary intervention did not differ between treatment groups. Interactions were observed between ischemic time and alteplase for coronary flow reserve (P=0.013), resistive reserve ratio (P=0.026), and microvascular obstruction (P=0.022), but not index of microcirculatory resistance. Conclusions In ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction with ischemic time ≤6 hours, there was overall no difference in microvascular function with alteplase versus placebo. Clinical Trial Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02257294.

Confirmation of maximal hyperemia by the incremental dose of intracoronary papaverine.

We investigated the effect of the papaverine dose increment method to confirm maximal hyperemia for fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements. We evaluated 115 consecutive patients involving 200 lesions. FFR was measured after intracoronary papaverine injection into the left (12 mg) and right (8 mg) coronary arteries as standard doses. Except for 2 patients who had ventricular tachyarrythmia (VTA), we administered a higher papaverine dose (2 mg added to the standard dose). We compared the FFR values after using different papaverine doses. VTA incidence and electrocardiogram parameters were compared according to the papaverine doses used. The QTU interval and corrected QTU were significantly prolonged after using a higher dose compared with a standard dose. VTA occurred in one patient (0.9%) at the higher dose. There was no significant difference with a strong correlation between the FFR values in the 2 doses (r = 0.963, P < 0.001). Maximal hyperemia was achieved in most patients at the standard papaverine dose. However, 19 lesions changed ischemic diagnosis at the higher dose (12 lesions changed from ischemia negative to positive, and 7 lesions changed from positive to negative). Therefore, to confirm the appropriate ischemia diagnosis for borderline FFR values, it may be favorable to perform another FFR measurement at an incremental papaverine dose.

Fractional Flow Reserve or Optical Coherence Tomography to Guide Management of Angiographically Intermediate Coronary Stenosis: A Single-Center Trial.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare optical coherence tomographic (OCT) guidance and fractional flow reserve (FFR) guidance in patients with angiographically intermediate coronary lesions (AICLs) in a single-center, prospective, 1:1 randomized trial. BACKGROUND: FFR and OCT imaging may help both in the assessment of AICLs and in percutaneous coronary intervention optimization. METHODS: Patients with AICLs were randomized to FFR or OCT imaging. In the FFR arm, PCI was performed if FFR was ≤0.80. In the OCT imaging arm, PCI was performed if area stenosis was ≥75% or 50% to 75% with minimal luminal area <2.5 mm2 or plaque rupture. Angina (evaluated using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire), major adverse cardiac events, and cost were assessed at the end of follow-up. The pre-defined primary endpoint was the composite of major adverse cardiac events or significant angina (defined as Seattle Angina Questionnaire frequency scale score <90) at 13 months. RESULTS: A total of 350 patients (with 446 AICLs) were enrolled (176 randomized to FFR and 174 to OCT imaging). The primary endpoint of major adverse cardiac events or significant angina at 13 months occurred in 14.8% of patients in the FFR arm and in 8.0% in the OCT imaging arm (p = 0.048). This result was driven by a statistically nonsignificant lower occurrence of all primary endpoint components. Up to 13 months, the rate of medically managed patients was significantly higher (p < 0.001) and total cost significantly lower (p < 0.001) with FFR in comparison with OCT imaging. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AICLs, OCT guidance is associated with lower occurrence of the composite of major adverse cardiac events or significant angina. FFR guidance is associated with a higher rate of medical management and lower costs. FFR or OCT Guidance to Revascularize Intermediate Coronary Stenosis Using Angioplasty [FORZA]; NCT01824030).

1-Year Outcomes of Angina Management Guided by Invasive Coronary Function Testing (CorMicA).

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that invasive coronary function testing at time of angiography could help stratify management of angina patients without obstructive coronary artery disease. BACKGROUND: Medical therapy for angina guided by invasive coronary vascular function testing holds promise, but the longer-term effects on quality of life and clinical events are unknown among patients without obstructive disease. METHODS: A total of 151 patients with angina with symptoms and/or signs of ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease were randomized to stratified medical therapy guided by an interventional diagnostic procedure versus standard care (control group with blinded interventional diagnostic procedure results). The interventional diagnostic procedure-facilitated diagnosis (microvascular angina, vasospastic angina, both, or neither) was linked to guideline-based management. Pre-specified endpoints included 1-year patient-reported outcome measures (Seattle Angina Questionnaire, quality of life [EQ-5D]) and major adverse cardiac events (all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, unstable angina hospitalization or revascularization, heart failure hospitalization, and cerebrovascular event) at subsequent follow-up. RESULTS: Between November 2016 and December 2017, 151 patients with ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease were randomized (n = 75 to the intervention group, n = 76 to the control group). At 1 year, overall angina (Seattle Angina Questionnaire summary score) improved in the intervention group by 27% (difference 13.6 units; 95% confidence interval: 7.3 to 19.9; p < 0.001). Quality of life (EQ-5D index) improved in the intervention group relative to the control group (mean difference 0.11 units [18%]; 95% confidence interval: 0.03 to 0.19; p = 0.010). After a median follow-up duration of 19 months (interquartile range: 16 to 22 months), major adverse cardiac events were similar between the groups, occurring in 9 subjects (12%) in the intervention group and 8 (11%) in the control group (p = 0.803). CONCLUSIONS: Stratified medical therapy in patients with ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease leads to marked and sustained angina improvement and better quality of life at 1 year following invasive coronary angiography. (Coronary Microvascular Angina [CorMicA]; NCT03193294).

Continuous intracoronary versus standard intravenous infusion of adenosine for fractional flow reserve assessment: the HYPEREMIC trial.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a continuous intracoronary (IC) adenosine infusion, administered through the novel HYPEREM™IC over-the-wire microcatheter, to measure fractional flow reserve (FFR). METHODS AND RESULTS: The HYPEREMIC trial was a randomised, non-inferiority, crossover study in which patients with intermediate coronary lesions were enrolled for sequential pressure wire studies. FFR was measured using intravenous (IV) (140-180 mcg/kg/min) versus continuous non-weight-adjusted IC (360 mcg/min) adenosine. Patients were randomised and blinded to the order in which they received the adenosine, separated by a washout period. The primary endpoint was the mean hyperaemic FFR. Forty-one patients were enrolled at three UK sites between June and November 2016. The mean (standard deviation) FFR was 0.82 (±0.09) after IC versus 0.84 (±0.09) after IV adenosine. The difference of -0.02 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.03 to -0.01) confirmed the non-inferiority (margin <0.05) of IC to IV adenosine. Intracoronary adenosine was associated with a shorter mean time to maximal hyperaemia (difference -44 [95% CI: -59 to -29] seconds; p<0.0001). Chest discomfort was reported in 32/41 (78.0%) patients during IV adenosine versus 12/41 (29.3%) patients during IC adenosine. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous IC adenosine was a reliable, faster and better tolerated method of achieving maximal hyperaemia compared to IV adenosine.

Interindividual Variations in the Adenosine-Induced Hemodynamics During Fractional Flow Reserve Evaluation: Implications for the Use of Quantitative Flow Ratio in Assessing Intermediate Coronary Stenoses.

Background Quantitative flow ratio (QFR), a novel functional angiography technique, computes fractional flow reserve (FFR) without pressure wires or adenosine. We investigated interindividual variations in the adenosine-induced hemodynamics during FFR assessment and their influence on QFR diagnostic performance. Methods and Results Patients with coronary stenoses who underwent intracoronary pressure and flow assessment were analyzed. Adenosine-induced hemodynamics during FFR measurement were determined by the percentage change in mean aortic pressure (%ΔPa) and the resistive reserve ratio (RRR). The diagnostic performance of QFR was evaluated and compared in each tertile of %ΔPa and RRR using FFR as reference. A total of 294 vessels (245 patients) were analyzed. Mean FFR was 0.80±0.11. Individuals showed a wide variation in the adenosine response in terms of %ΔPa (ranging from -75% to 43%; median, -9% [interquartile range, -3% to -17%]) and the RRR (ranging from 0.45 to 20.15; median, 3.1 [interquartile range, 2.1-4.9]). No significant differences for diagnostic efficiency of QFR were found between tertiles of %ΔPa (area under the curve for the receiver-operating characteristic analysis, 0.950 in tertile 1, 0.929 in tertile 2, and 0.910 in tertile 3; P=0.270) or between tertiles of the RRR (area under the curve for the receiver-operating characteristic analysis, 0.909 in tertile 1, 0.923 in tertile 2, and 0.959 in tertile 3; P=0.167). The classification agreement between QFR and FFR was not significantly modified by %ΔPa (tertile 1, 89%; tertile 2, 87%; and tertile 3, 86%; P=0.827) or by the RRR (tertile 1, 86%; tertile 2, 85%; and tertile 3, 91%; P=0.398). Conclusions Patients undergoing FFR assessment show large interindividual variations in the magnitude of adenosine-induced hemodynamics. However, such variations do not affect the diagnostic performance of QFR in assessing the functional relevance of observed stenoses.

Impact of increasing dose of intracoronary adenosine on peak hyperemia duration during fractional flow reserve assessment.

BACKGROUND: Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) is currently indicated as a first line strategy for the functional assessment of intermediate coronary stenoses. However, the protocol for inducing hyperemia still lacks standardization. Intracoronary adenosine boli, with a progressive increase to high-dosage, have been proposed as a sensitive and accurate strategy for the classification of coronary stenoses, although being potentially affected by the achievement of plateau of the effect and by a less prolonged and stable hyperemia as compared to intravenous administration. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to define the conditioning parameters and assess the impact of increasing-dose intracoronary adenosine on peak hyperemia duration in patients undergoing FFR for intermediate coronary stenoses. METHODS: FFR was assessed in patients with intermediate (40 to 70%) lesions by pressure-recording guidewire (Prime Wire, Volcano), after induction of hyperemia with intracoronary boli of adenosine (from 60 to 1440 µg, with dose doubling at each step). Hyperemic duration was defined as the time for the variation form minimum FFR ±â€¯0.02 and time to recovery till baseline values. RESULTS: We included 87 patients, undergoing FFR evaluation of 101 lesions. Mean peak hyperemia duration and time to recovery significantly increased with adenosine doses escalation (p = 0.02 and p < 0.001). Peak hyperemia duration and time to recovery with 1440 µg adenosine were 14.5 ±â€¯12.6 s and 45.2 ±â€¯30.7 s, respectively. Hyperemia duration was not related to Quantitative Coronary Angiography (QCA) parameters or FFR values. In fact, a similar increase in the time of hyperemic peak was noted when comparing patients with positive or negative FFR (pbetween = 0.87) or patients with lesions < or ≥20 mm (pbetween = 0.92) and lesions involving left main coronary or proximal left anterior descending artery (LAD) (pbetween = 0.07). A linear relationship was observed between time to recovery and FFR variations, with a greater time to baseline required in patients with FFR ≤ 0.80 (p = 0.003) and in lesions ≥ 20 mm (p = 0.006), but not in LAD/LM lesions (p = 0.55). CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows a progressive raise in the duration of peak hyperemia and time to recovery, after the administration of increasing doses of intracoronary adenosine for the assessment of FFR. Therefore, considering the potential advantages of a high-dose adenosine protocol, allowing a more prolonged hyperemia and a more precise and reliable measurement of FFR, further larger studies with such FFR strategy should certainly be advocated to confirm its safety and benefits, before its routinely use recommendation.

Effect of intracoronary adenosine on ergonovine-induced vasoconstricted coronary arteries.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of adenosine on epicardial coronary artery diameter during ergonovine provocation testing. METHODS: A total of 158 patients who underwent an ergonovine provocation test with intracoronary adenosine injection between 2011 and 2014 were selected. Patients were divided into four groups based on the severity of percent diameter stenosis following intracoronary ergonovine administration: Group 1, induced spasm < 50%; Group 2, 50-89%; Group 3, 90-99%; and Group 4, total occlusion. RESULTS: Spasm positivity was observed in 44 (27.8%) cases in the study population (mean age, 57.4 ± ± 10.7 years). Intracoronary adenosine increased the diameter of the ergonovine-induced epicardial artery by 0.51 ± 0.31 mm, 0.73 ± 0.39 mm, 0.44 ± 0.59 mm, and 0.01 ± 0.04 mm in Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Subsequent administration of nitroglycerin further increased vessel diameter by 0.49 ± 0.28 mm, 0.93 ± 0.68 mm, 2.11 ± 1.25 mm, and 2.23 ± 0.69 mm in Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. The ratios of adenosine-induced diameter to reference diameter were significantly lower in patients with spasm positive results (0.68 [0.59-0.76] vs. 0.18 [0.00-0.41], p < 0.001 in the study population; 0.60 [0.54-0.67] vs. 0.40 [0.27-0.44], p < 0.001 in Group 2) with the best cut-off value of 0.505 (sensitivity 0.955, specificity 0.921). CONCLUSIONS: Intracoronary administration of adenosine dilated the ergonovine-induced vasoconstricted epicardial coronary artery. The ratio of adenosine-induced diameter to reference diameter was significantly lower in patients with spasm positive results.

Contrast Fractional Flow Reserve (cFFR): A pragmatic response to the call for simplification of invasive functional assessment.

AIM: To review the current approaches to simplify functional assessment of coronary stenosis with particular regard for contrast Fractional Flow Reserve (cFFR). METHODS AND RESULTS: Maximal hyperaemia to assess FFR is perceived as time-consuming, costly, unpleasant for the patient and associated with side effects. Resting indexes, like Pd/Pa and iFR, have been proposed to circumvent the use of vasodilators as well as an approach based on the administration of contrast medium to induce coronary vasodilation, the cFFR. Contrast FFR can be obtained quickly, at very low cost in the absence of substantial side effects. Among these alternative indexes, cFFR shows the best correlation with FFR, reduces the use of adenosine even more than a hybrid resting approach but has not yet been tested in a randomized, controlled trial with clinical end-points. CONCLUSION: cFFR represents a cheap, safe and effective alternative to FFR, able to facilitate the dissemination of a functional approach to myocardial revascularization.

Intravenous nicorandil versus adenosine for fractional flow reserve measurement: a crossover, randomized study.

Nicorandil has vasodilatory effects on both the epicardial coronary arteries and the coronary microvasculature, thereby increasing coronary blood flow. The objective of the present study was to investigate the effectiveness of intravenous (IV) nicorandil infusion for fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement. In this crossover randomized study, 49 patients underwent FFR measurement with a consecutive randomized order of patient-blind infusions of continuous IV adenosine administration and a single bolus IV administration of nicorandil. The primary endpoint was the difference between the FFR by nicorandil and the FFR by adenosine, as assessed by the Bland-Altman method. The mean FFR value measured by nicorandil was not significantly different from that measured by adenosine [0.8125 ± 0.1349 vs. 0.7978 ± 0.124; mean difference, 0.0147 (95% confidence interval - 0.0373, 0.0667); P = 0.58]. There was no clinically significant diagnostic discordance, with the FFR by nicorandil > 0.80 and that by adenosine < 0.75. Hyperemia was achieved earlier using nicorandil than adenosine (34 ± 13 vs. 58 ± 15, P < 0.001). The duration of hyperemia after IV nicorandil was variable (6-570 s, mean 89 ± 98 s). IV nicorandil decreased systolic blood pressure by 32 ± 16 mm Hg (24 ± 10%) from baseline. Linear regression analysis showed that the average FFR value and the difference in systolic blood pressure were significantly associated with the bias in the FFR value between the two drugs. In conclusions, the results of the present study suggest that IV nicorandil can achieve maximal hyperemia easily and rapidly, providing an acceptable diagnostic performance for FFR assessment. However, a wide range of variation in hyperemic plateau and a decrease in blood pressure are the major limitations of this method.

Sinus Standstill in a Patient after Intracoronary Papaverine Administration for a Coronary Fractional Flow Reserve.

A 78-year-old woman had paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and effort angina. Two months before she was admitted for a coronary angiography, she had been feeling dizzy. A Holter 24-hour electrocardiography monitor exhibited an asymptomatic episode of 2.9 seconds of RR interval. She underwent a coronary angiography, which showed intermediate stenosis in the left descending artery. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement using intracoronary papaverine administration was performed. After intracoronary papaverine (12 mg) administration, pause of 4 seconds led to polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT), although the VT terminated spontaneously. Premature ventricular beat occurred and led to sustained polymorphic VT. In cardiac electrophysiology study, pacing from the right atrium showed that the maximum sinus node recovery time (SRT) was 910 ms. After procainamide (10 mg/kg) administration, the maximum SRT was 16.3 seconds with some junctional escapes. After intravenous papaverine administration, there was a slight change. Intracoronary papaverine administration induced about 9-seconds pause with some junctional escapes. We conclude that intracoronary papaverine administration reveals potential sinus node dysfunction. The patient has been asymptomatic since the implantation of the pacemaker. Patients with suspicious sinus dysfunction should be careful.